Seems like the article has about the same as me overall opinion about the open road behaviour of these cars: it's OK, not more.
Funny excerpts:
Race derived braking and track developped chassis (Brakes are not good, to be polite, and the chassis is the same as on the GT. My GT went to the track, you can see its pictures in my thread: totally destroyed. Perhaps someone mentioned the Open Cup chassis and they forgot to write down "open" ?).
(The drawing of the suspension architecture shows a wrong front antirol bar. How do they do ?)
The Cup's extra gear ratio (Do I undestand correctly that Cup had a 7 gear transmission ?)
It seems hard to believe that the same bunch of engineers responsible for the misguided QP (I guess QP4) also conceived, developped and eventually signed off the chassis of this car (I'd be currious to know differences between both except for the front struts, an improved floor reinforcement under the firewall and a longer QP body. I'm pretty sure that even front bearing hubs are the same, despite the different struts).
Funny excerpts:
Race derived braking and track developped chassis (Brakes are not good, to be polite, and the chassis is the same as on the GT. My GT went to the track, you can see its pictures in my thread: totally destroyed. Perhaps someone mentioned the Open Cup chassis and they forgot to write down "open" ?).
(The drawing of the suspension architecture shows a wrong front antirol bar. How do they do ?)
The Cup's extra gear ratio (Do I undestand correctly that Cup had a 7 gear transmission ?)
It seems hard to believe that the same bunch of engineers responsible for the misguided QP (I guess QP4) also conceived, developped and eventually signed off the chassis of this car (I'd be currious to know differences between both except for the front struts, an improved floor reinforcement under the firewall and a longer QP body. I'm pretty sure that even front bearing hubs are the same, despite the different struts).
Last edited: